Comparación del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico versus un antibiótico

P. Carlos Osorio; Maria Eliana Icochea Darrigo; S. Pablo Reyna; G. John Guzmán; M. Fernando Cazorla; C. Fernando Carcelén

Comparación del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico versus un antibiótico

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic

P. Carlos Osorio, Maria Eliana Icochea Darrigo, S. Pablo Reyna, G. John Guzmán, M. Fernando Cazorla, C. Fernando Carcelén

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.

Translated title of the contribution	Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	219-222
Number of pages	4
Journal	Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru
Volume	21
Issue number	2
State	Published - 2010

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 20010 Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. All rights reserved.

Cite this

@article{f7a8d79130b84253ad631cf5a1b96fc0,

title = "Comparaci{\'o}n del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probi{\'o}tico versus un antibi{\'o}tico",

abstract = "The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin{\textregistered} Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.",

keywords = "Antibiotic, Broiler chickens, Probiotic",

author = "{Carlos Osorio}, P. and {Icochea Darrigo}, {Maria Eliana} and {Pablo Reyna}, S. and {John Guzm{\'a}n}, G. and {Fernando Cazorla}, M. and {Fernando Carcel{\'e}n}, C.",

year = "2010",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "21",

pages = "219--222",

journal = "Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru",

issn = "1682-3419",

publisher = "Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparación del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico versus un antibiótico

AU - Carlos Osorio, P.

AU - Icochea Darrigo, Maria Eliana

AU - Pablo Reyna, S.

AU - John Guzmán, G.

AU - Fernando Cazorla, M.

AU - Fernando Carcelén, C.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.

AB - The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.

KW - Antibiotic

KW - Broiler chickens

KW - Probiotic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045854345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85045854345

SN - 1682-3419

VL - 21

SP - 219

EP - 222

JO - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru

JF - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru

IS - 2

ER -

Comparación del rendimiento productivo de pollos de carne suplementados con un probiótico versus un antibiótico

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this