Entomological factors affecting the low endemicity of chagas disease in Nazca, Southwestern Peru

Claudia Paredes-Esquivel, Emilio Lecaros, Mauro Aguliar-Rosales, Hilda Solis Acosta, Pedro Castellanos

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Chagas disease is prevalent in Peru. The province of Nazca, in the southwestern region of the country, shows a high intradomiciliary infestation rate of Triatoma infestans bugs. Although the vector is present, the number of Chagas disease cases appears to be much lower than those reported in the neighboring region of Arequipa. We examined 624 T. infestans from Nazca to determine the current Trypanosoma cruzi infection rates, and found that no bugs were infected with this parasite. These results contrast with those found in Arequipa, where 19-30% triatomines have been reported infected. To compare their vectorial capacity, we infected 30 T. infestans specimens, selected both from Nazca and Arequipa, by feeding bugs on T. cruzi-infected mice. The parasites developed all stages expected in the vector; furthermore, the infective stage, metacyclic trypomastigote, was found in both insect populations from the second week after infection. In addition, those insects that accepted to be fed with mice blood defecated immediately after finishing blood meal, indicating that they might be efficient vectors. We maintain that differences observed in infection rates between vectors from Nazca and Arequipa may be explained by differences in host availability. In Arequipa hosts are mainly small animals, whereas in Nazca the main blood source comes from birds, which are refractory to the infection. © 2010, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)341-346
Number of pages6
JournalVector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Entomological factors affecting the low endemicity of chagas disease in Nazca, Southwestern Peru'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this