TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimating the Global Burden of Endemic Canine Rabies
AU - Hampson, Katie
AU - Coudeville, Laurent
AU - Lembo, Tiziana
AU - Sambo, Maganga
AU - Kieffer, Alexia
AU - Attlan, Michaël
AU - Barrat, Jacques
AU - Blanton, Jesse D.
AU - Briggs, Deborah J.
AU - Cleaveland, Sarah
AU - Costa, Peter
AU - Freuling, Conrad M.
AU - Hiby, Elly
AU - Knopf, Lea
AU - Leanes, Fernando
AU - Meslin, François Xavier
AU - Metlin, Artem
AU - Miranda, Mary Elizabeth
AU - Müller, Thomas
AU - Nel, Louis H.
AU - Recuenco, Sergio
AU - Rupprecht, Charles E.
AU - Schumacher, Carolin
AU - Taylor, Louise
AU - Vigilato, Marco Antonio Natal
AU - Zinsstag, Jakob
AU - Dushoff, Jonathan
PY - 2015/4/16
Y1 - 2015/4/16
N2 - Rabies is a notoriously underreported and neglected disease of low-income countries. This study aims to estimate the public health and economic burden of rabies circulating in domestic dog populations, globally and on a country-by-country basis, allowing an objective assessment of how much this preventable disease costs endemic countries. We established relationships between rabies mortality and rabies prevention and control measures, which we incorporated into a model framework. We used data derived from extensive literature searches and questionnaires on disease incidence, control interventions and preventative measures within this framework to estimate the disease burden. The burden of rabies impacts on public health sector budgets, local communities and livestock economies, with the highest risk of rabies in the poorest regions of the world. This study estimates that globally canine rabies causes approximately 59,000 (95% Confidence Intervals: 25-159,000) human deaths, over 3.7 million (95% CIs: 1.6-10.4 million) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 8.6 billion USD (95% CIs: 2.9-21.5 billion) economic losses annually. The largest component of the economic burden is due to premature death (55%), followed by direct costs of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP, 20%) and lost income whilst seeking PEP (15.5%), with only limited costs to the veterinary sector due to dog vaccination (1.5%), and additional costs to communities from livestock losses (6%). This study demonstrates that investment in dog vaccination, the single most effective way of reducing the disease burden, has been inadequate and that the availability and affordability of PEP needs improving. Collaborative investments by medical and veterinary sectors could dramatically reduce the current large, and unnecessary, burden of rabies on affected communities. Improved surveillance is needed to reduce uncertainty in burden estimates and to monitor the impacts of control efforts.
AB - Rabies is a notoriously underreported and neglected disease of low-income countries. This study aims to estimate the public health and economic burden of rabies circulating in domestic dog populations, globally and on a country-by-country basis, allowing an objective assessment of how much this preventable disease costs endemic countries. We established relationships between rabies mortality and rabies prevention and control measures, which we incorporated into a model framework. We used data derived from extensive literature searches and questionnaires on disease incidence, control interventions and preventative measures within this framework to estimate the disease burden. The burden of rabies impacts on public health sector budgets, local communities and livestock economies, with the highest risk of rabies in the poorest regions of the world. This study estimates that globally canine rabies causes approximately 59,000 (95% Confidence Intervals: 25-159,000) human deaths, over 3.7 million (95% CIs: 1.6-10.4 million) disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and 8.6 billion USD (95% CIs: 2.9-21.5 billion) economic losses annually. The largest component of the economic burden is due to premature death (55%), followed by direct costs of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP, 20%) and lost income whilst seeking PEP (15.5%), with only limited costs to the veterinary sector due to dog vaccination (1.5%), and additional costs to communities from livestock losses (6%). This study demonstrates that investment in dog vaccination, the single most effective way of reducing the disease burden, has been inadequate and that the availability and affordability of PEP needs improving. Collaborative investments by medical and veterinary sectors could dramatically reduce the current large, and unnecessary, burden of rabies on affected communities. Improved surveillance is needed to reduce uncertainty in burden estimates and to monitor the impacts of control efforts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84929483927&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709
DO - 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003709
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 25881058
AN - SCOPUS:84929483927
SN - 1935-2727
VL - 9
JO - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
JF - PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
IS - 4
M1 - e0003709
ER -