Use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines

Gloria Carmona, Catherine Bonilla, Karen Huamán, Nora Reye, Gisely Hijar, Patricia Caballero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

© 2017, Instituto Nacional de Salud. All rights reserved. This study reports the experience obtained by the National Institute of Health of Peru in the use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations as one of the stages of the process of adaptation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system. Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study describes: 1. the public health problems addressed in the dialogues; 2. the role of the involved parties; 3. the parameters that were considered before and during the discussions; 4. the challenges for optimizing these dialogues and stimulating the interaction between scientific evidence and the added value provided by the involved parties through their experiences, perspectives, and knowledge for the development of recommendations in health.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)738-743
Number of pages6
JournalRevista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this