TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of the productive performance in broilers supplemented with probiotic or antibiotic
AU - Carlos Osorio, P.
AU - Eliana Icochea, D.
AU - Pablo Reyna, S.
AU - John Guzmán, G.
AU - Fernando Cazorla, M.
AU - Fernando Carcelén, C.
PY - 2010/1/1
Y1 - 2010/1/1
N2 - © 20010 Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. All rights reserved. The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.
AB - © 20010 Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. All rights reserved. The present study compared productive parameters in broilers supplemented with a probiotic Biomin® Poultry 5 Star (Enterococcus faecium, Pediococcus acidilactici, Bifidobacterium animalis, Lactobacillus salivarius y Lactobacillus reuteri) versus an antibiotic (Bacitracin). A total of 333 chicks were divided into three treatments of 111 animals with 3 repetitions for group: 1 control; 2 antibiotic; 3 probiotic. During the six weeks of the study no statistical differences were found between treatments for body weight, feed consumption, feed conversion, mortality rate, and productive efficiency index.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045854345&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045854345&origin=inward
M3 - Article
SN - 1682-3419
SP - 219
EP - 222
JO - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru
JF - Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Peru
ER -