TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of critical thinking in doctoral students in education
AU - Lira, Luis Alberto Nunez
AU - Perez, Yolanda Felicitas Soria
AU - Pinto, Jesus Daniel Collanque
AU - Rivera-Lozada, Oriana
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, by the author(s).
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Critical thinking in university studies is the cornerstone for the development of research processes at the doctoral level; it becomes the vector of this action, whose processes in the management of learning will require that the competencies understood are developed by teachers and students, for the achievement of the goals proposed by the actors involved. This is how the research had the purpose of measuring the critical thinking of university doctorate students whose methodology was quantitative, with a population of 150 students, which allowed, in the first place, to establish the reliability and the analysis of the construct of the instrument used (Watson-Glaser test) and whose results showed a reliability of 0.77, KMO of 0.757 with a bilateral significance of 0.000. Likewise, of the five dimensions or factors of the instrument, five have a positive impact on moderate levels (Nagelkerke's pseudo-R square of 0.574) excluding inference. The descriptive analysis established that 11.3% present critical thinking at the advanced level.
AB - Critical thinking in university studies is the cornerstone for the development of research processes at the doctoral level; it becomes the vector of this action, whose processes in the management of learning will require that the competencies understood are developed by teachers and students, for the achievement of the goals proposed by the actors involved. This is how the research had the purpose of measuring the critical thinking of university doctorate students whose methodology was quantitative, with a population of 150 students, which allowed, in the first place, to establish the reliability and the analysis of the construct of the instrument used (Watson-Glaser test) and whose results showed a reliability of 0.77, KMO of 0.757 with a bilateral significance of 0.000. Likewise, of the five dimensions or factors of the instrument, five have a positive impact on moderate levels (Nagelkerke's pseudo-R square of 0.574) excluding inference. The descriptive analysis established that 11.3% present critical thinking at the advanced level.
KW - Academic management
KW - Critical thinking
KW - Education
KW - Reasoning
KW - Research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098450855&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5430/ijhe.v9n9p71
DO - 10.5430/ijhe.v9n9p71
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85098450855
SN - 1927-6044
VL - 9
SP - 71
EP - 79
JO - International Journal of Higher Education
JF - International Journal of Higher Education
IS - 9
ER -