TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of chronic stress and chewing over pain.
AU - Aguirre-Siancas, Elias
AU - Seclén-Ubillús, Yovanna
AU - Ruiz-Ramírez, Eliberto
AU - Portilla-Flores, Oscar
AU - Crispín-Huamani, Luis
AU - Alarcón-Velásquez, Lucer
AU - Lam-Figueroa, Nelly
PY - 2019/1/1
Y1 - 2019/1/1
N2 - © 2019 Fundacion para la difusion neurologica en Ecuador - FUNDINE. All rights reserved. Introduction: Chronic stress and mastication affect the response to pain; however, there is little knowledge about the relationship between these variables. Objective: Determine the influence of chronic stress and mastication on the response to pain. Methods: thirty-two 8-week-old male Balb/c mice were used. The sample was divided into 4 equal groups: Group N: normal mastication without stress; Group NE: Normal chewing + stress, Group D: deficient chewing without stress and Group DE: Poor chewing + stress. The response to the painful stimulus was evaluated through the tail withdrawal assay due to a thermal stimulus. Results: By comparing the 4 experimental groups to the fourth and the eighth week through the ANOVA test yielded a value of p = 0.982 and p = 0.176; respectively. By applying the ‘t’ student, within each group, in comparison of the variation of the pain response between the fourth and eighth week, the values of p = 0.52; p = 0.17; p = 0.84 and p = 0.069 were obtained for the group N, NE, D and DE respectively. Conclusion: Chronic stress and mastication do not modify the response to pain in albino Balb/c mice.
AB - © 2019 Fundacion para la difusion neurologica en Ecuador - FUNDINE. All rights reserved. Introduction: Chronic stress and mastication affect the response to pain; however, there is little knowledge about the relationship between these variables. Objective: Determine the influence of chronic stress and mastication on the response to pain. Methods: thirty-two 8-week-old male Balb/c mice were used. The sample was divided into 4 equal groups: Group N: normal mastication without stress; Group NE: Normal chewing + stress, Group D: deficient chewing without stress and Group DE: Poor chewing + stress. The response to the painful stimulus was evaluated through the tail withdrawal assay due to a thermal stimulus. Results: By comparing the 4 experimental groups to the fourth and the eighth week through the ANOVA test yielded a value of p = 0.982 and p = 0.176; respectively. By applying the ‘t’ student, within each group, in comparison of the variation of the pain response between the fourth and eighth week, the values of p = 0.52; p = 0.17; p = 0.84 and p = 0.069 were obtained for the group N, NE, D and DE respectively. Conclusion: Chronic stress and mastication do not modify the response to pain in albino Balb/c mice.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074525874&origin=inward
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85074525874&origin=inward
M3 - Article
SN - 1019-8113
SP - 13
EP - 18
JO - Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurologia
JF - Revista Ecuatoriana de Neurologia
ER -