Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: The evolving codes of nomenclature

Sandra Knapp, Gerardo Lamas, Eimear Nic Lughadha, Gianfranco Novarino

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaReseña científica

44 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Nomenclature, far from being a dry dusty subject, is today more relevant than ever before. Researchers into genomics are discovering again the need for systems of nomenclature - names are what we use to communicate about organisms, and by extension the rest of their biology. Here, we briefly outline the history of the published international codes of nomenclature, tracing them from the time of Linnaeus in the eighteenth century to the present day. We then outline some of what we feel are the major challenges that face the codes in the twenty-first century; focusing primarily on publication, priority, typification and the role of science in the naming of organisms. We conclude that the codes are essential for taxonomists in the pursuance of their science, and that the democratic nature of decision-making in the regulation of the rules of nomenclature, though sometimes perceived as a potential weakness, is in fact one of its great strengths.
Idioma originalInglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)611-622
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volumen359
N.º1444
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 29 abr 2004

Palabras clave

  • Botany
  • History of nomenclature
  • Microbiology
  • Naming
  • Taxonomy
  • Zoology

Huella Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: The evolving codes of nomenclature'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto