Use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines

Gloria Carmona, Catherine Bonilla, Karen Huamán, Nora Reye, Gisely Hijar, Patricia Caballero

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

4 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

© 2017, Instituto Nacional de Salud. All rights reserved. This study reports the experience obtained by the National Institute of Health of Peru in the use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations as one of the stages of the process of adaptation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system. Using a multidisciplinary approach, this study describes: 1. the public health problems addressed in the dialogues; 2. the role of the involved parties; 3. the parameters that were considered before and during the discussions; 4. the challenges for optimizing these dialogues and stimulating the interaction between scientific evidence and the added value provided by the involved parties through their experiences, perspectives, and knowledge for the development of recommendations in health.
Idioma originalInglés estadounidense
Páginas (desde-hasta)738-743
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónRevista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 oct. 2017

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Use of deliberative dialogues for the formulation of recommendations for clinical practice guidelines'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto